I have found out that my daughter has suffered emotional harm caused directly my the actions of social services. This completely contradicts the reason for the removal of my daughter “risk of future emotional harm” by myself for reporting suspected abuse.
Where is their logic and reasoning?
I still don’t understand, that a man who was caught masturbating in front of a 7 year old, flashed his penis to a 5 year old and my daughter has disclosed he has been touching her is free to see my daughter, but myself who reported my daughters disclosures has to be supervised. I still can’t understand how they don’t see the risk of the mother trying to suffocate my daughter.
Both the Courts and social services do not see that there is anything wrong with sexual abuse. Am I missing something?
The social worker phoned up yesterday offering me contact, after 2 months, one hour a week, I told them to f*** off (I put it more politely) as court order said no less than 7 hours a week in my house. They want me to be shut in a room in a contact centre and INVOICE me for the privilege of seeing my daughter. She twisted it around saying that I have refused contact.
The social worker stated that I am SUPERVISED because I did not let go the fact that my daughter has said that Granddad X “shows her his willy and lets her touch it” Social services said he might have a doll called willy, and that after having finger nail marks inside her vagina, painful urination and vaginal discharge stating “the monster has put his finger nails up my bum” Social Services said it was emotional abuse seeking medical attention. Shortly after this disclosure she was admitted to hospital vomiting blood, bleeding from the groin / kidney area. Social workers tried to alter the medical report and said I needed to see a Psych because I challenged them.
These are just a few of the disclosures. Social service said I am jumping to conclusions that she has been abused. They also said that I was demanding that they corrected false information; one occasion they altered medical information and another was falsifying evidence of a police investigation that never took place; it was stopped by social services as they wanted to investigate, but SS immediately closed the case.
ONE WOULD SAY THE ACTIONS OF SOCIAL SERVICES WAS ILLEGAL – obviously not
Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/anonymousantiss